Friday, January 27, 2006

a blog by any other name would smell as sweet

It’s been a substantially long time since I’ve posted, and I make no excuses. I’ve been pretty busy at work, which is good. When not at work, I’ve been dealing with tons of paperwork related to, among other things, the house Gretchen and I are getting, homeowner’s insurances quotes, taxes, and wedding things. And I’ve been trying to catch up on my reading, since I have a pile of 20 books or so to get through, along with the weekly newspaper and monthly magazine I receive in the mail. And I have to get in a game of online Scrabble every now and then. But again, I make NO excuses.

There were a lot of big sports stories this past week. One of them was Kobe Bryant scoring 81 points in one game against the Raptors last Sunday. It was the second highest total in a game ever. That is a LOT of points. At this point, the debate rages on. Is he a selfish ball hog, or one of the greatest players of the current generation? Though compromise is not allowed in this day and age, I’d say it’s a little bit of both. He needs to get the ball and shoot a lot to be able to score 81 points. And he definitely shoots a lot. Even though he was lying, he said after the game that all he cares about is the win. And in a way, that’s true. So what if comes by 6 people all chipping in 10 or 15 points, or one guy putting up 50 or 60? A win is a win. Kobe haters say, “He’s so selfish; he never passes.” He had two assists that game. Yet, Kobe is a shooting guard. He shoots. He isn’t a point guard. They pass the ball, set up the plays, and run the team basically. But go on and criticize him for doing his job. I think he is an arrogant jerk, who cheats on his hot wife (though he didn’t sexually assault that chick in Colorado; he just picked a psycho broad to mess around with). So, while his moral character is questionable, he plays basketball very well. We could judge Kobe and hold him to a higher moral standard because he’s a celebrity, but why do that when there are probably a hundred cheating maintenance men and florists in Kansas City as I write this? Athletes as role models isn’t the best idea, but for every asshole out there, there’s a genuine nice guy for the kids to look up to also. And I think most kids are smart enough to figure out who the bad apples are and who aren’t.

I’ll tell you what was ridiculous. Isaac Mizrahi grabbing Scarlett Johansson’s breast at the Golden Globes, that’s what’s ridiculous. See the video here. I don’t care how gay you are; you don’t go grabbing people’s breasts, penises, or taints. The stupid commentator woman justified it with that simple reason. He’s gay, so he’s allowed. Well, I guess it’s fine if I go grab a dude’s groin, since I’m straight. “Oh no, don’t worry, man. It’s cool; I’m straight, so we’re fine.” Ridiculous. Isaac Mizrahi’s got a lot of growing up to do. Way out of line. I don’t think it would be right for a woman to grab another woman’s boob. There are a couple of forums where breast-grabbing is acceptable: engaged in sexual activities (of course), in the operating room (implants, etc.), and perhaps in adult-oriented entertainment (say strip clubs, for example). Again, “acceptable” and “appropriate” are two different terms. While strip clubs aren’t necessarily the classiest of places, I find it much more appropriate that a dirty paying customer grabs a stripper’s breast than when Mizrahi did it on live television outside the awards show Monday night. And, it wasn’t a big deal. It seems like Johansson took it all in stride. I just thought it was a bit presumptuous to go ahead and grab her teat, that’s all. (As an aside, I enjoyed it the other day when I heard Dan Patrick, on his ESPN radio show, say, “Scarlett and her two Johannsons looked good the other night.”)

Tuesday, January 10, 2006

litigation

Society's litigiousness in this day and age absolutely enrages me.

Get your piece of the pie some other way, assholes.

My anger stems from a new book out that I'd like to read called "The True Stella Awards" by Randy Cassingham. It's a whole book about the ridiculous lawsuits you hear about in the news every now and then. The "Stella" referred to is the original idiot who sued McDonalds because she spilled her coffee, burned herself, and claimed it was too hot. The coffee was too hot. (After reading a bit further into the story, while I don't know the final outcome of the lawsuit, I did learn that McDonalds admits it heats its coffee to 180 degrees or some extreme temperature, so that people can't finish it all in one sitting, and keep coming up for refills. I assume it's aimed at all the elderly tightwads who frequent McDonalds for a 6 AM breakfast and 2-hour newspaper reading session.)

But it seems this knee-jerk reaction is prevalent in today's society, and while at times it's reasonable, for the most part it seems to be an irresponsible and greedy attempt to profit from an unfortunate situation. And, again, there are some instances where it might be suitable, but this book is filled with the ones that I'm sure will get your blood boiling and leave your mouth agape.

In other news, Gretchen and I just signed on a house. I guess there's no turning back now. Honestly, though, it's exciting. Oh, and I got a foosball table for Christmas, so I'm learning how to play foosball better now too.

Alright, back to work for another hour and a half. Have a good weekend.

Tuesday, January 03, 2006

to phree or not to phree

That is the question.

I stumbled upon this section of the website last week. Want to be a Writer?


I had always assumed it was similar to the Onion, where there was a certain group of hired writers and that was that. But, apparently, there are hundreds of contributors across the country that submit stories every week. (See the Contributors section for that large list.)

So now I wonder, do I attempt to submit some stories to the Phat Phree? I've always enjoyed everything I've read on the site. Inappropriate and sexually-tinged humor is right up my alley. But can I produce something they'd be looking for? I guess it's worth a shot. It isn't for the money (they don't offer any) or the fame (I prefer to avoid the limelight); I just think it would just be cool to see a submission by me on one of my favorite sites. The only other catch is "We also want people who are interested in contributing regularly," say the editors of the Phat Phree. I can't guarantee that would happen, as infrequent posts on my blog might illustrate. In the end, I was pondering sending something in, but I thought I'd get everyone's two cents on the issue.

PS - I thank Brad K. especially, because he introduced me to the Phat Phree about a year ago. It was a beautiful moment indeed. Also, it's Brad's birthday tomorrow. Happy birthday. Loser.